9/11 Building 7 Explained

Top Categories

Top Searches:

Top News Searches:

Top Entertainment :

Top Here :

9/11 Building 7 Explained

Uploaded by: mrneutrongodeon
Video Description:
A clip from "The 9/11 Conspiracies: Fact or Fiction", a documentary produced by The History Channel and Scientific American.

For the Converte avi video format, mp4 also for the portable you need this software: : SUPER

Tags for this video: 9-11 9/11 911 building7 collapse wtc

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by mrneutrongodeon

Related Videos

fuked up	The 9/11 Conspiracies - Fact Or Fiction Debunked - Part 1	Proof that 9/11 was an inside job!!!

Dylan Avery Tells It Like It Is!	Pissed-off fireman at Ground Zero (9/11/06)	9/11 ACI - WTC 7 Implosion by Richard Gage Part II

Partage cette Video:

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

LINK FAGGOT ( 5 months ago by SgtSimpson)

LINK FAGGOT

Here's the link to ... ( 5 months ago by Machida356)

Here's the link to the FBI's Bin Laden Wanted Page. I'll spoon feed it to you since it's too hard for you to type in "FBI Most Wanted" and click on Bin Laden's profile. Pathetic. w w w. fbi. gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen. htm Notice absolutely NO direct connection with the events of September 11, 2001? So like I said before Bin Laden has not been formally charged (aka indicted) in connection to 9/11. It is a fact.

He has only been ... ( 5 months ago by Machida356)

He has only been informally charged by people on the TV and others, not the FBI. So, keep watching TV and don't research anything so that you can believe what you are told. No questions to authority. Follow the sheep in front of you. Good girl.

The History Channel ... ( 5 months ago by superc)

The History Channel is insulting the intelligence of the human being.

If you are a real ... ( 5 months ago by superc)

If you are a real scientist, why would you RULE OUT the possibility of Controlled Demolition? That is not to say the government did it. REGARDLESS OF WHO DID IT, a controlled demolition hypothesis has to have a median to high probability along with the theories set put by the other government affiliated engineers.

I love it when they ... ( 5 months ago by superc)

I love it when they captioned "EXPERT RESPONSE" by people from Popular Mechanics Magazine. That's as expert as you can get :)

6:02 - that ... ( 5 months ago by superc)

6:02 - that building was closer to the twin towers than WTC 7, and yet its skeletal frames remained in tact. WTC 7 had NOTHING, all brought down into a pile of rubble.

a lot of trouble to ... ( 5 months ago by Mairinohailche)

a lot of trouble to get rid of some filing cabinets. he said!!! rumsfeld had announced that the pentagon had 'lost $3 trillion and the documentation was in that building along with exron case. now its all gone and nobody is saying anything!!

"If you are a real ... ( 2 months ago by conotoxin)

"If you are a real scientist, why would you RULE OUT" - You do not. However to give that theory any credence, you must have some evidence to support it. Unfortunately for the twoofahs, all the available evidence supports the "popular account."
WTC1
2 were hit by hijacked airliners
failed due to structural damage
fire. WTC was struck by debris
failed due to structrual damage and fire.
Given the absence of evidence for the "demolition" theory, it is not credible.

Building Seven had ... ( 2 months ago by justanotherkevin)

Building Seven had damage to one corner of the building, and yet all four corners failed at the same time.
The damage was asymmetrical and therefore the collapse should have been as well.

This video says it ... ( 2 months ago by xxtomasfoleyxx)

This video says it all, explanation given, but for some of you, who claim to have your eyes open its never enough, theres always another conspiracy round the corner. For the most of you, I say take a look at what youve become in the mirror.. Truth is beyond you, you've lost the plot
to the director of Loose Change, I hope sum1shoots u for making money
fame from ppl's suffering
loss.... Flodding the net with conspiracy
disounouring the dead is a disgrace. What kind of human beings are you??

There's a point ... ( 2 months ago by xxtomasfoleyxx)

There's a point where freedom of speech becomes offensive to those who have suffered
you have no concept of the term "fact". Evidence is circumstatial
cherry picked to suit a conspiracists mind. Guess who else brain washes people that way?? Islamist terrorists, who have their own warped idea of "facts".. spreading hatred, through videos and supposed proof, to people like you, too stupid to disregard their attempts to use you, to glorify themselves. Free speech or blind offensive ignorance??

haha, you are the ... ( 1 month ago by serjflo)

haha, you are the type of guy who believes OJ Simpson did not kill the white woman because of absence of evidence. Building seven never even made to the 9/11 report. The evidence is that never in the history of the planet buildings ever fell on their own footprint at the speed of gravity because of fire. Even houses made of wood dont fall on their footprint. If you think steal would fold like that then you are ignorant and not enough proof could convince you otherwise.

So people has to ... ( 1 month ago by serjflo)

So people has to agree with the government or they are terrorist and offensive?

Im drawing obvious ... ( 1 month ago by xxtomasfoleyxx)

Im drawing obvious parallels, not labelling conspiracists terrorists... sadly however these far feached opinions, baseless in fact... can only be otributed to mental weakness and manipulation... you choose what you want to believe.. faked TV, bombs planted by government to mass murder... And yes of course its offensive to spread such messages and beliefs... just like Islamist Terrorists are brain washed. We know in hypnotherapy studies that around 10% of population are "highly suggestive"...

Weak minded people. ... ( 1 month ago by xxtomasfoleyxx)

Weak minded people... who choose the books to read, the films to view, with no wish for proof... but instead just take pleasure in the belief that they are right and the experts are lying to us all... That is a dangerous frame of mind and it is exactly how islamist terrorists get sucked into strapping bombs to themselves. Just because you think something is plausable, it dosent make it true. I am genuinly upset for victims of 9/11 that instead of tributes, they get nothing but conspiracy

There are plenty of ... ( 1 month ago by serjflo)

There are plenty of independent experts(not the ones the work for the government) that dont agree with the official theory.Can you consider the possibility that you could be the "weak minded people" who chose to believe the official story without reasonable questioning. It's not out of the realm of possibility that the government did this to be able to advance their political agenda. It has happened before search the Tonkin Gulf lie which lunch the Vietnam war.

"If you are a real ... ( 1 month ago by conotoxin)

nice one!! well ... ( 1 month ago by xxtomasfoleyxx)

nice one!! well said... glad to see some people can see the wood for the trees...

Jesus God the ... ( 1 month ago by DillirdQThurman)

Jesus God the doublespeak going on this fucking thing. "sounds kind of sexy." WHAT!? This documentary is so full of holes and doesn't explain ANYTHING! It doesn't EXPLAIN ANYTHING! Loose change even Zeitgeist, 911 truth go into great detail, site their sources (of which there are many) these people are obviously making up just anything barely conceivable as a valid explanation. Well, I'm not a "twoofah" but I"m also not a complete gullible moron. There was no reason to go to war! INSIDE JOB!

"Just because you ... ( 1 month ago by DillirdQThurman)

"Just because you think something is plausible, it doesn't make it true." This is easily applicable to this "official story" presented here. Blocking information, of any kind is called 'willful ignorance.' I've heard all these arguments before, you weigh the facts, you go with what is, to your best judgment, the truth. And I'm not that gullible to believe that this wasn't a False Flag operation. It was. "nothing but conspiracy" wrong, we also get police state measures.

You simply refuse ... ( 1 month ago by deadcell626)

You simply refuse to see the truth for what it is don't you?

OJ Simpson is a ... ( 1 month ago by xxtomasfoleyxx)

OJ Simpson is a totally different example lol... Im not one to disbalive in conspiracy, supression of truths, or miscarriages of justice... I just have the intelligence and independance of mind not to believe far feached claims, just because its plausable. I welcome people with an open mind on all "facts", but im afraid too many of you, get sidelined into believeing any conspiracy, when you could better spend your time challenging the true injustices and deceptions in this world

so was it ... ( 3 weeks ago by whalefish83)

so was it demolished or did it collapse on its own accord? did Larry make a profit from what happened that day or didnt he?

Tell a friend:

DayliMusique

Welcome in Video Search Engine

9/11 Building 7 Explained

URL
Embed Code