Federer - Ancic Wimbledon 2008 Highlights (Q-Finals)

Top Categories

Top Searches:

Top News Searches:

Top Entertainment :

Top Here :

Federer - Ancic Wimbledon 2008 Highlights (Q-Finals)

Uploaded by: poopinou
Video Description:
Federer -Ancic Wimbledon 2008 Highlights (Q-Finals)
2nd July 2008

For the Converte avi video format, mp4 also for the portable you need this software: : SUPER

Tags for this video: 2008 ancic federer finals mario nadal quater roger super tennis wimbledon

Find more videos in the "Sports" category
See more videos uploaded by poopinou

Related Videos

Wimbledon Finals 2008 Federer Vs Nadal	Federer vs. Soderling Wimbledon 2008 Highlights Day 3	Roger Federer Magic -- Ancic Beatdown

The GREATEST Roger Federer Tribute 2 (High Quality)	Federer and Sharapova	Top 10 Best of Roger Federer

Partage cette Video:

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

if u like tennis ... ( 4 months ago by stalagmite)

if u like tennis and u watch interviews of those guys u must have heard that, i'm not making this up and neither i`m going to make a search for that, that's your job if u want.

agree ... what ... ( 4 months ago by stalagmite)

agree ... what about the olympics... he will win that too for sure!!!

one thing is what ... ( 4 months ago by Sh3vCh3nk0)

one thing is what people say another thing is the facts then how the players play the game, just im saying in the old era there was more competition, now there onley two players nadal and federer.. wonder why federer have so many titles winining only a rival (nadal) how many time i have to say that.

first they are not ... ( 4 months ago by stalagmite)

first they are not only people, they are ex pros who u may want to hear, second, not only the titles count to determine if a player is the best (sampras is not the best of all times), the technique is very important and federer is a living book of tennis technique, third today's level is actually so high that makes their dominance more valuable, that 2 players are on top doesn't mean there less competition (cause every one wants to defeat them and they can) they just have a plus.

tell me if they ... ( 4 months ago by Sh3vCh3nk0)

tell me if they cant win, dont you think they have more titles?, and tennis is not about technique, is about dicipline and mentality, theres many players have an excelent technique for example gasquet, but stills he need's mentality, just admit federer plays in an easy Era of tennis, federer is not the beast of all times, what a point have win only a rival oh my god tha sample it is

i never said is ... ( 4 months ago by stalagmite)

i never said is only technique, i said "is also important" and again just because a player is ahead of its time doesn't mean is an easy era, means he is a genius, or is this also an easy era in golf (tiger) or sampras lived in an easy era?, lance armstrong must have lived in an easy era too, may be kasparov ?

he's a genius? oh ... ( 4 months ago by Sh3vCh3nk0)

he's a genius? oh my god, it seems you never see the tennis of old ERA but well im not to discuss this with someone who thinks federer is the beast of all times, yeah he's a excelent player, im not saying he's not, but thiks he's the beast of all times, i think needs more time, and maybe make it? and tennis and golf there diferent sports, it has nothing to do dont change the subject, im not to argue more with someone that it seems never have seen the tennis of serve and volly have a good day

i wasn't changing ... ( 4 months ago by stalagmite)

i wasn't changing subject, examples to show that dominance is not equal to easy era and it happens in many sports. And come on u are 23 how many matches of borg or mcenroe u saw on live.

sorry 29 miss print ( 4 months ago by stalagmite)

sorry 29 miss print

oh man we are in ... ( 4 months ago by Sh3vCh3nk0)

oh man we are in the XXI century i dont need to see the matches on live, but well you keep think federer is the beast of all times, is just to funny!

can't even tell u ... ( 4 months ago by stalagmite)

can't even tell u how wrong u are, watching a live match is way different than watching it on tv, that
´s no the point but wrong wrong wrong. Agassi, Noah, Sampras have stated that federer is just the best. May be your opinion from watching tv is more valuable ... that is funny!!

well. so can you ... ( 4 months ago by Sh3vCh3nk0)

well. so can you tell why the beast player of all times? can win a grand slam this year? you just care what other players say about him, just watch his records and in what era he won all that

if a 4.5 player ... ( 4 months ago by oneguy23)

if a 4.5 player played federer on a hard court and if both players tried their best what would be the score (best out of 5 sets)?

well the season is ... ( 4 months ago by stalagmite)

well the season is not over yet, but why not? because winnig a grand slam is not an easy job, up to 2007 he has been winning 3 per year and many masters. This year 2 finals. That's on this era, unless u think last year was along time ago. That record is incredible. And not only I care for what other players say (that's actually important) but I have seen him on action many times and his tennis is simply great.

Nadal is clearly ... ( 4 months ago by JwebGuru)

Nadal is clearly improving on those surfaces, though. Three or four years ago, he was completely written off on grass; this year, he beat Federer at Wimbledon. If he can up his game on hard courts the same way he did on grass he could conceivably best Federer even there.

i met him and his ... ( 4 months ago by manufreak911)

i met him and his trainer was a pratt.

Get it right " ... ( 4 months ago by BLINDA1977)

Get it right "manufreak911", more like he met u and u were the prat!!

straight sets for ... ( 4 months ago by nadalrocks1)

straight sets for fed. you'd be lucky to get a game off of him

ancic was lucky the ... ( 3 months ago by magicalgrasshopper)

ancic was lucky the rain came in the second set...it would have tuned into a complete white wash

i love you mario =)) ( 2 months ago by hercegovka1234)

i love you mario =))

ancic has an ugly ... ( 2 months ago by angryniggah)

ancic has an ugly style, almost as ugly as tim mayottes but not quite.

thats cuz the grass ... ( 1 month ago by no1sportsfreak)

thats cuz the grass courts at wimbledon r getting slower so its gettin a little easier for nadal its basically lk playing on the clay courts in roland garros but he definetly won't be up on his hard court games trust me there r sitlls lots of guys that can beat nadal on hard

Man Federer fucked ... ( 1 month ago by NEDM123)

Man Federer fucked his ass.

Federer!!!!! DaMn ... ( 6 days ago by writebud)

Federer!!!!! DaMn FrEaKiNg super PrO

Tell a friend:

DayliMusique

Welcome in Video Search Engine

Federer - Ancic Wimbledon 2008 Highlights (Q-Finals)

URL
Embed Code